16 Jul 2018
The application for leave was dismissed because the applicant failed to set out any grounds in the Form 86 or the affirmation; merely attaching the Secretary's refusal letter did not disclose an arguable ground for judicial review and therefore leave could not be granted.
26 Oct 2017
The Permanent Secretary lawfully refused to rescind the deportation order because he legitimately exercised his wide discretion after considering relevant material; he was under no legal duty to give detailed reasons to a person without the right to remain; family rights and the CRC do not oblige rescission for persons without right to remain; there was no procedural unfairness, irrationality or arguable discrimination, and consequently no basis to grant extension of time or leave to apply for judicial review.
9 May 2017
The Permanent Secretary lawfully exercised his delegated discretion; the applicants' proposed grounds were not reasonably arguable because family and other representations were considered, no procedural unfairness occurred, an outstanding non‑refoulement claim was not material to rescind the deportation order, no Wednesbury unreasonableness was shown and no evidence of discriminatory practice was established; accordingly extension of time, leave to amend and leave for judicial review were refused and the substantive application dismissed.
21 Oct 1998
Leave was refused because the Secretary for Security's offer to defer the decision pending Vietnamese enquiries and the consideration given to family unity, taken with the applicant's prior breaches of immigration orders, meant the decision could not be said to be Wednesbury unreasonable and no arguable case for judicial review was established.