2 Apr 2020
葉偉鴻及另一人 對 葉偉霖
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 315
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA225/2018
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospect of success and there were no issues requiring appellate consideration; the original judge had properly exercised discretion in balancing relevant factors when granting the interlocutory injunction, so no intervention was warranted; the stay of execution was refused; costs were ordered against the defendant for the interlocutory proceedings with specific summary assessments.