13 Mar 1983
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MELHADO INVESTMENT LTD
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MELHADO INVESTMENT LTD
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV79/1982
The Court held that the descriptions in the Schedule are merely descriptive and do not themselves restrict use; the express covenant prohibiting erection of buildings without the Crown's licence is the operative restriction; no implied covenant restricting change of use could be implied under the BP Refinery tests; no custom was proved; accordingly the storage of steel girders (as pleaded) did not constitute a breach of the Block Crown Lease and the declarations below were correctly granted.