18 Oct 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 邱德貴
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3689
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA67/2024
Appellant failed to demonstrate that non-receipt of the notice was not caused by his own negligence because he admitted irregular mailbox collection and possible loss due to a full mailbox; therefore s16A(1) relief is not available and the magistrate's order (fixed penalty, equal additional penalty and costs) was correctly made and is upheld.