26 Jan 2018
MARMA AONGMAPRU v. YU CHEUK-MAN, ESQ. [Decision on Leave Application]
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 50
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL369/2017
The adjudicator correctly applied the legal tests: the applicant's evidence did not meet the statutory and treaty thresholds for torture, CIDTP or persecution; injuries lacked required severity for BOR3; available state protection meant BOR2 risk not established; there was no procedural unfairness or error of law; the application was not reasonably arguable and had no realistic prospect of success, therefore leave was refused.