16 Oct 2013
HKSAR v. MISTUN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. MISTUN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC264/2012
The judge did not err: informing the applicant she was suspected of committing a dangerous drug offence was sufficient for admissibility of the post-arrest and video-recorded statements; the trial judge was entitled to accept the inspector's evidence; excluding the speculative cross-examination question and giving a standard lies direction did not produce a material irregularity or unfairness; no lurking doubt was shown and the conviction should be upheld.