8 May 2002
HKSAR v. CHEUNG KING KING
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHEUNG KING KING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA352/2002
The magistrate was entitled to reject the appellant's account as implausible and accept the undercover officer's detailed evidence; because the magistrate properly approached the evidence and made factual findings establishing the offence, the appellate court must dismiss the appeal; furthermore, refusal to substitute duty counsel did not amount to reversible error as the scheme does not guarantee choice of counsel.