15 May 2026
The applicant advanced no viable grounds to overturn the Deputy Judge's refusal of leave; the matters raised were general allegations without particulars and failed to show any error of law, irrationality or procedural unfairness in the Board's decision, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
17 Mar 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the judge's refusal to grant leave to apply for judicial review and did not advance any viable ground of appeal against the Order.
23 Jan 2026
The application for leave was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify arguable grounds or make full and frank disclosure in Form 86, the Board's adverse credibility and primary fact findings were lawful and rational, state protection and internal relocation were available, and the intended challenge was not reasonably arguable with realistic prospects of success.
12 May 2023
The Court refused leave and dismissed the challenge because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable legal error, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's and Director's evaluation of risk, and the Court will not usurp the Board's evaluative role absent such errors.
8 Sept 2022
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b) and there was no basis on the 'otherwise' limb; the Court accepted the Board's factual findings that there was no real risk of harm and dismissed the Notice of Motion.
1 Sept 2022
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any viable ground of error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision and therefore had no realistic prospect of success to justify leave for judicial review; the Deputy Judge's refusal of leave was correct.