25 Mar 2026
Leave dismissed because the application was filed out of time without a satisfactory explanation and, on the merits, the intended judicial review lacked reasonable arguability: the Board's decision demonstrated no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality and met the enhanced Wednesbury standard.
9 Jun 2025
Leave was refused because the Board reached adverse credibility and factual conclusions supported by identified material discrepancies which the applicant failed to explain; the Board applied the law correctly and observed fair procedure so no arguable public law error (error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality) existed to justify granting leave.
9 Jun 2020
The applicant's grounds were bare, unparticularised and not reasonably arguable; the judge did not commit error of law or procedural unfairness in dismissing the leave application; there was no realistic prospect of success on the meritorious non-refoulement issues and the appeal is therefore dismissed.