15 May 2026
The applicant failed to advance any viable ground demonstrating that the Judge erred; no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality was identified in the Board's decision; therefore the refusal of leave was correctly upheld and the appeal is dismissed.
15 Apr 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Judge's refusal of leave; his grounds were general, lacked particulars and did not meet the standard required to overturn the Judge's decision.
26 Aug 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable grounds; the TCAB/NCRPO's findings on credibility, risk, state protection and internal relocation were within the primary decision-maker's province and were not shown to involve procedural unfairness, legal error or irrationality under the enhanced Wednesbury standard.
25 Mar 2025
The applicant failed to show a significant change of circumstances under s.37ZO or any realistic prospect of success on a subsequent non-refoulement claim; the Director lawfully treated the claim as a continuation of the prior claim and properly relied on country information; accordingly leave to apply for judicial review is refused and an RPO is appropriate to prevent further abusive proceedings.
23 Aug 2023
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the Board reasonably and lawfully assessed credibility, state protection and internal relocation; the Board afforded appropriate consideration to the unrepresented minor and there were no unadvanced minor-specific non-refoulement grounds giving any realistic prospect of success.
30 Jul 2020
Leave was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable or reasonable prospect of success: the Board's factual findings and application of law were not shown to be erroneous, and credibility and risk assessments fall within the Board's primary province as established in Re: Kartini, so judicial intervention was not justified.