16 Jun 2022
RE LAU HOI TO
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 1703
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCA3230/2020
The caveator, a creditor claiming an unproven monetary debt, did not demonstrate a contrary interest in the estate or a legitimate interest in the relief under section 36 PAO; she had not pursued a section 36 application or a probate action despite time and information to do so; the outstanding loan was a disputed unsecured claim and not shown to be a material non-disclosure that justified retention of the caveat; accordingly the caveat and appearance were an abuse of process and properly struck out and the Master's order was affirmed.