4 Mar 2026
RE CHOY SHIU TIM
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1338
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB7443/2025
The petition was dismissed as an abuse of process because the petitioner failed to prove the alleged HK$21,000,000 loan had been advanced to Chiu or produce any contemporaneous evidence of remittance despite repeated requests, the guarantee did not extend to payments to Venture Smart, and the statutory demand and petition were therefore insufficient to establish an undisputed debt; indemnity costs were awarded against the petitioner.