14 Dec 2007
"A" v. THE SECURITIES & FUTURES COMMISSION AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- "A" v. THE SECURITIES & FUTURES COMMISSION AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL84/2007
The warrant was valid and within the authority of the SFO; omission of the company name and precise dates did not render it invalid where the suspected offences (criminal and civil insider dealing) were clearly stated and the warrant limited seizure to documents producible under s183. The statutory requirement in s182(3) to produce the Direction is a machinery requirement and does not require the Direction to be attached to or produced with a search warrant at execution.