20 Feb 2009
ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Citation
- ANTHONY JAMES HATTON v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP840/2007
Material non-disclosure was established in relation to the overly broad definition of 'Group Companies' and the requirement to disclose cash takings of companies the 1st defendant did not control; given the significance of those omissions and the excessive scope of the order, the court exercised its discretion to discharge the Anton Piller order and dismissed the inspection summons, directing parties to proceed by ordinary discovery and leaving responsibility for disclosure to the defendants' solicitors.