16 May 2016
HONG KONG (SAR) HOTEL LTD v. WING KEY CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
- Citation
- HONG KONG (SAR) HOTEL LTD v. WING KEY CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT57/2009
Clause 25(1)(c) lawfully applied: the contract's definition of Works includes temporary safety works; architect's AIs and BD complaints amounted to valid notices requiring rectification; defendant persistently neglected to rectify safety defects and those defaults materially affected the Works; the employer's determination notice of 5 October 2009 was not unreasonable or vexatious; the architect's notional final account is not a condition precedent to recovery under clause 25(3)(d); liquidated damages and damages were computed accordingly and plaintiff entitled to recover net amount of HK$10,…