7 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to particularise or substantiate any error in the judge's refusal of leave; bare allegations do not constitute viable grounds and the Court will not intervene absent errors of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality.
6 May 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the Deputy Judge correctly found no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision and the applicant advanced no viable, substantiated grounds to justify granting leave for judicial review; the Court of Appeal will not re-examine the Board's merits findings in a leave appeal.
25 Mar 2026
The court found the applicant's complaints amounted to factual disputes about witness credibility and trial findings already considered on appeal, not to an arguable point of law of major and wide importance under s32(2); accordingly there was no basis to issue a certificate and the application was dismissed.
17 Mar 2026
The applicant failed to identify any viable ground of appeal or to particularize any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision or the Judge's refusal of leave; accordingly there was no basis for the Court of Appeal to interfere and the appeal was dismissed.
17 Mar 2026
The applicant failed to identify any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Deputy High Court Judge's decision refusing leave; the allegations were general and unparticularised, and therefore did not establish a viable ground to grant leave to apply for judicial review; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the refusal of leave is affirmed.
17 Mar 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant advanced no viable ground to overturn the judge's refusal of leave; there was no demonstrated error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision, and the applicant had an opportunity to be heard.
2 Mar 2026
Because the applicant failed to identify any error in the Judge's refusal to grant leave, provided no particulars and raised no viable grounds, and given authorities limiting appellate intervention, there was no basis to interfere with the Judge's decision and the appeal was dismissed.
16 Feb 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the 1st applicant failed to identify any viable, particularised error in the Leave Decision; general and vague assertions of fear and inability to relocate do not meet the threshold for leave and there is no basis to interfere with the judge's refusal of leave.
5 Jun 2025
The appeal is dismissed because the Applicant failed to identify any viable legal ground; the Judge correctly refused leave as the Board's adverse credibility findings were factual determinations not susceptible to judicial review absent error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality, and no such error was shown.
13 Mar 2025
The appeal is dismissed because the Applicant failed to identify any viable ground to overturn the Judge's refusal of leave; the Board's decision showed no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality and internal relocation was assessed as viable.