15 Apr 2014
RAFIQUE MUHAMMAD v. HSIN CHONG INTERIORS (HONG KONG) LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- RAFIQUE MUHAMMAD v. HSIN CHONG INTERIORS (HONG KONG) LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI675/2013
The Master refused the proposed supplemental questions 5 and 6 because the joint report already provided the relevant medical findings and the contested questions sought conclusions on specific working hours, days, overtime capability, equipment or assistance and detailed degree-of-compromise which are matters the trial judge must determine from the evidence; therefore the questions were unnecessary and outside the proper scope of supplemental expert opinion.