1 Nov 2023
BC v. MSH also known as H, MSO AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2023] HKFC 222
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC13741/2019
Court found wife’s HKD 1,080,100 ATM withdrawals were explained as family and living expenses and not wanton or concealed so not added back; wife’s AUD125,000 withdrawal lacked satisfactory explanation and was added back; husband’s disclosure on crypto investments was unsatisfactory but the court accepted the investments were bona fide market losses and not wanton or reckless, so no add-back of initial crypto sums; Australian MPF treated as unilateral and carved out but Australian bank funds and AUD125,000 were not proven to be non-matrimonial (AUD125,000 added back); total matrimonial pot as…