9 Jun 2021
ETIK ISWANTI v. TORTURE CLAIM APPEAL BOARD
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1589
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL411/2021
The Director lawfully and rationally refused permission to make a subsequent non-refoulement claim because the new material was hearsay/speculation and did not demonstrate a significant change together with prior material to give a realistic prospect of success; accordingly leave to apply for judicial review was refused. The Applicant’s repeated, manifestly groundless proceedings about the same issue amounted to habitual and persistent vexatious litigation justifying a proportionate Section 27 order with specified conditions.