29 Nov 1993
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TRAN VAN TIEP
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TRAN VAN TIEP
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3312/1993
Judge proceeded on assumption for present exercise that s13E(1) and s32(4)(a) authorisations were valid, balanced public interest in ensuring continuity of a major criminal trial against respondents' liberty interests, found in‑camera evidence showed most respondents' testimony was sufficiently important, and concluded that except for three specified respondents further s32(4)(b) detention orders should be granted for a limited period (14 days from 3 December 1993) pending future applications where jurisdictional and factual challenges must be addressed by the Director.