3 Jun 2016
WRJ also known as WR v. CWCP
- Citation
- WRJ also known as WR v. CWCP
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC5599/2015
The court found the applicant's s.17 MPPO and s.52B/inherent jurisdiction applications weak on the evidence insofar as he could not satisfy the court that dispositions would defeat his financial claim, but having regard to partial success (obtaining undertakings and agreement that withdrawn funds be added back to matrimonial assets), the parties' conduct and costs correspondence, the just outcome was to make no order as to costs up to and including 6 January 2016 and the consent summons dated 6 January 2016, and to order the applicant (husband) to pay the respondent's costs of the summons dat…