28 Dec 2018
LI PING CHUN AND ANOTHER v. LIANG TONGHUA
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2757
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA745/2011
The court found the plaintiffs have a good arguable proprietary claim that the assignments were suspect and potentially voidable under s.60 CPO, the Mareva and asset preservation criteria are satisfied as to TH and extendable to HW and KW on the facts, and therefore the interim Mareva injunction and asset preservation order should continue; HW and KW's restraint is limited to dealing with the two properties and an asset disclosure order is granted only against TH.