21 Mar 2016
CHEN NINGNING v. KING & WOOD (a firm)
- Citation
- CHEN NINGNING v. KING & WOOD (a firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP163/2012
On the balance of probabilities the alleged Pre-retainer Agreement and the 2nd set of oral representations did not exist; the contractual retainer was wholly contained in the written Retainer Letter so extrinsic conflicting terms were inadmissible; the 3rd Bill was a final agreed bill for the period and the defendant was estopped from issuing the 4th Bill which covered the same period so the 4th Bill is not entitled and is struck out; because the 1st–3rd Bills had been paid and the plaintiff failed to establish the requisite special circumstances under s67(2) to reopen taxation, the plaintiff…