29 May 2009
HKSAR v. HO WING YUE
- Citation
- HKSAR v. HO WING YUE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA979/2008
The combined evidence (access to refusal records, link to the return address through PW2, mail forwarding in a surname used by the appellant, and the appellant's fingerprint on one letter) made it the only reasonable inference that the appellant prepared and sent the complaint letters; the signatures were forged so the letters were false instruments under s69(a)(i), and the required double intention under s73 was proved, therefore the convictions were safe.