19 Jun 2020
鍾鼎禮 對 鄧玉蘭
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1306
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA44/2019
Leave to appeal was refused because the appellant's grounds challenged factual findings that were supported by evidence and affirmed by the tribunal, the appellant produced no evidence to support the claimed additional HK$12,500 deposit, and the application to adduce fresh evidence (letting agent) at the leave stage violated the principle of finality and the limits on receiving further evidence under the rules; no special circumstances existed to permit appellate interference.