17 Oct 2005
HKSAR v. CHEUNG MING TAT
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHEUNG MING TAT
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA881/2006
Conviction upheld because the appellant admitted begging and the name error in the Brief Facts was immaterial given correct identification elsewhere; the three‑month hospital order exceeded the maximum lawful period (one month) for the offence and therefore must be quashed and replaced by a one‑month hospital order.