18 Apr 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 婁子堅
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 1062
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA241/2022
The appeal was dismissed because the trial court lawfully admitted and properly weighed Y's contemporaneous screenshots and recordings (as matters Y personally observed and produced), accepted expert evidence linking the Telegram account to the appellant's phone number, rejected speculative alternative explanations as unsupported, found no appearance of prejudicial judicial bias, and concluded the combined evidence permitted the only reasonable inference that the appellant operated the Telegram account and published the obscene materials; the sentence of 12 months imprisonment was within prop…