14 Mar 2016
LEE SAI NAM v. LI SHU CHUNG AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LEE SAI NAM v. LI SHU CHUNG AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1711/2009
Indemnity costs were refused because, on the facts, the claimant’s conduct did not amount to the requisite affront to the court or abuse of process beyond ordinary hostile litigation and credibility findings; certification for three counsel was refused but two counsel certified as reasonable; the nisi costs order was varied to grant certificate for two counsel and, subject to that, made absolute; Ken and Joseph’s belated attempt to vary was out of time and their request was rejected, and they were ordered to pay the costs of the variation applications to be taxed if not agreed.