15 Jun 2022
Extension of time was refused because the applicant failed to provide any satisfactory explanation for delay or to update his address for service, failed to attend the hearing, and the intended appeal had no real prospect of success; in all the circumstances it was not in the interests of justice to grant an extension.
26 Jul 2019
Extension of time was refused because the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay, the second judicial review application was an abuse of process/res judicata following the prior refusal, new grounds could not be raised on appeal, and the judge had given sufficient reasons, rendering the intended appeal hopeless.
4 Feb 2019
Refusal of extension of time and leave to appeal because the applicant was contactable at the address he provided, failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay, and advanced no arguable grounds or real prospect of success such that extending time would not be in the interests of justice.
30 Oct 2018
The court held that the Plaintiffs had sued the correct party despite an incorrect address in the writ and that the impugned amendment did not substitute one party for another; there was no reasonable prospect of success on appeal and the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiffs.