27 Jun 2002
WAN SHU PUI AND OTHERS v. AU YUK LUN AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- WAN SHU PUI AND OTHERS v. AU YUK LUN AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA252/2000
The defendants failed to discharge the Order 14 burden because their pleaded defence (oral reduction of salary, set‑off by provident fund, misconduct allegations) was not believable when tested against contemporaneous documents (notably the 2 July 1999 employment/salary letter and employer's remuneration returns) and the defendants' assertions were speculative; consequently there was no triable issue and summary judgment in favour of the 3rd plaintiff was correctly affirmed.