18 Feb 2025
律政司司長 訴 華德剛
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 724
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB1174/2023
The application for extension was refused because the applicant's delay of over seven months was excessive and unexplained, the proposed appeal had no real prospect of success (medical evidence did not justify non‑attendance and the debt was undisputed), and granting an extension would unfairly prejudice the creditor; on this basis the court declined to exercise its discretion to extend time.