29 Jan 2019
LCYP v. JEK
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 237
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMC3/2018
CTC was joined as 2nd respondent because valid service in Delaware had been established, the joinder was necessary and convenient to determine whether the JK Trust funds were available to the Husband and to facilitate enforcement of any order, and Order 15 rule 6(2)(b) authorises joinder where a third party's presence is necessary for just and complete determination of disputed issues; the Husband did not oppose joinder.