27 Dec 2006
HAU CHAT TONG v. HAU CHAK LAM
- Citation
- HAU CHAT TONG v. HAU CHAK LAM
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ4772/2005
The judge accepted the plaintiff's evidence as more reliable, found that the defendant's transfer of his share did not operate as full and final settlement of the indebtedness, and applied the Smith realistic‑prospect test to conclude the defendant has no realistic prospect of success on appeal; accordingly leave to appeal and a stay of execution were refused and costs were ordered against the defendant.