7 Mar 2025
HSKN v. STTJO
- Citation
- [2025] HKFC 46
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC11462/2017
Court found no sufficient basis to draw adverse inference against Respondent for non-disclosure, rejected Petitioner's hidden assets case, characterised dispute as primarily a needs case given limited matrimonial pot, discounted illiquid MPF by 10%, awarded a lump sum to Petitioner calculated as 35% of joint monthly income multiplied by 17 years (HK$675,325), ordered child maintenance and educational/medical cost sharing (2/3 by Respondent), directed winding up and closure of joint accounts, dismissed ancillary claims on compliance, and ordered Respondent to pay 75% of Petitioner's costs.