30 May 1995
R. v. SINGH DHALINER and Others
- Citation
- R. v. SINGH DHALINER and Others
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC15/1995
The convictions of the 5th and 6th accused were quashed because the trial judge fundamentally erred by not giving them the full benefit of their clear good character, rendering their convictions unsafe; additionally the 5th's alibi was improperly rejected on timing/distance findings and the 6th's conviction rested on weak identification (no parade, acceptance by demeanour alone), whereas the leave applications of the 1st, 3rd and 4th accused lacked sufficient merit and were refused.