21 Feb 1995
R. v. TEED SISKO SUSAN
- Citation
- R. v. TEED SISKO SUSAN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA13/1995
The magistrate was not entitled on the evidence to find the appellant was driving faster than she stated; absence of evidential support for that inference left a lurking doubt whether the appellant drove carelessly, therefore the conviction could not stand and was quashed.