27 Jun 1990
THE QUEEN v. LO SIU WING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. LO SIU WING AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC509/1989
On admissibility the court held D2's cautioned statements were properly admitted because police did not promise immunity but only to submit his proposal to the legal authority and no evidence showed the statements were induced. On the substantive charge against D5 the panel was divided: the majority concluded the prosecution evidence permitted an inference that D5 knew a harmful act would occur and shared the requisite intent so his conviction should be upheld; a dissenting judgment concluded the evidence did not establish knowledge that the bucket contained corrosive fluid and quashed the co…