28 Mar 2008
HKSAR v. WU MUDI alias BAO XIUJIN
- Citation
- HKSAR v. WU MUDI alias BAO XIUJIN
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC358/2007
Enhancement under s.27(11) Cap.455 was available because the offence type was still prevalent, but the judge erred in applying the 50% enhancement to the aggregate sentence rather than to each individual count and failed to observe the totality principle; accordingly the aggregate sentence was excessive and must be reduced from six years two months to five years two months imprisonment with the specified arrangement of consecutive and concurrent terms.