3 Dec 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the application did not disclose an arguable case with a reasonable prospect of success.
19 Nov 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the decisions alleged to be subject to review were non-existent, the applicant failed to produce or identify any supporting decision or documents despite opportunity, the claim was not reasonably arguable and there was no decision for the court to scrutinize under the scope of judicial review.
3 Nov 2021
The proposed question was not a proper question of law because it was insufficiently specific and amounted to a disguised challenge to factual findings; the applicant failed to show a reasonable prospect of success that the Board's conclusion was the only reasonable conclusion on the facts; therefore the Board was entitled to refuse to state a case and the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
26 Apr 2021
Leave to appeal under s22(1)(b) was refused because the applicant failed to identify any arguable error of law or any question of general or public importance; the Board's factual findings (private/local incidents over 15 years old and no persistent threat) were endorsed and no statutory criterion for leave was met.
17 Dec 2019
Leave was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable ground; there was no error of law or procedural unfairness in the administrative process or decision, and therefore no reasonable prospect of success.
25 Nov 2019
The court refused leave because the applicant's proposed grounds were not reasonably arguable, there was no demonstrated error of law or procedural unfairness in the Board's process or decision, and therefore there was no reasonable prospect of success in the intended judicial review application.
25 Nov 2019
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable case of error of law or procedural unfairness and there was no reasonable prospect of success in the intended application.
23 Sept 2019
The court refused leave because the applicant failed to demonstrate a reasonably arguable case: there was no error of law or procedural unfairness in the Board's process or decision and no reasonable prospect of success in the intended application.
23 Sept 2019
Leave to apply for judicial review is refused because the applicants failed to establish an arguable error of law or procedural unfairness and had no reasonable prospect of success.
11 Sept 2019
Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the proposed grounds were not reasonably arguable, there was no demonstrated error of law or procedural unfairness in the Director/Board's decision, and there was no reasonable prospect of success.