18 Feb 2021
WOO WAN MAN SUSANA v. SUNFLOWER TRAVEL SERVICE LTD
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 339
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA35/2020
Leave refused because the adjudicator's primary findings were factual and lawful: no evidence existed that the defendant knew of country-specific stricter requirements or of the non-immigration stamps; claimant did not request a passport check; the conditions for implying a contractual Duty to Advise were not met; s5 SSITO did not impose the asserted proactive advisory duty on these facts; the adjudicator's costs exercise was within discretion. No error of law shown and no prospect of success on appeal.