6 Jul 2022
香港特別行政區 訴 陳港文及另一人
- Citation
- [2022] HKCA 984
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC197/2017
Leave to appeal was refused because the trial judge correctly excluded the seized goods from proceeds, properly assessed realisable assets after rejecting unsupported claims of third‑party ownership, and there was no arguable error of law or principle; A1 withdrew his appeal and A2 presented only misunderstandings of the statutory calculation which do not merit leave.