12 Feb 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any viable ground to overturn the Deputy High Court Judge's refusal of leave; there was no demonstrated error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision and the Court will not substitute its own evaluation of the Board's factual assessments.
14 Jan 2026
The application was out of time by over one year; applying established extension factors and precedent, and given the applicant admitted the Board was not wrong and raised no valid ground of error of law or procedural unfairness, there was no realistic prospect of success; accordingly extension of time was refused and leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
13 Jan 2026
The applicant failed to identify any arguable legal ground or demonstrate an error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the TCAB Decision; the TCAB applied correct legal principles and reasonably concluded state protection and internal relocation were available; therefore there was no reasonably arguable case and leave was refused.
6 Jan 2026
Leave to apply for judicial review is refused because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable ground of error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the TCAB decision; the TCAB had considered the evidence, applied correct legal principles, made entitled findings of fact (including that the applicant's evidence was untruthful/speculative/wholly unreliable) and concluded state protection/internal relocation were available; the intended challenge had no realistic prospect of success and the application was also brought out of time.
11 Nov 2025
Leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed because the TCAB conducted an oral hearing, considered the relevant COI and materials including those relied on by the DOI, applied the correct legal approach (USM) to each ground and reasonably concluded the Applicant's allegations were not made out; no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality was demonstrated and the additional materials did not change the assessment.
5 Sept 2025
Leave was refused because the applicant failed to identify any arguable public law ground and did not demonstrate any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's findings that he lacked credibility, faced no real risk, and could rely on state protection or internal relocation.
27 Aug 2024
Leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable error of law, irrationality or procedural unfairness in the Director's or the Board's decisions; the decisions were supported by evidence that the risk from the creditor was low, state protection and internal relocation were available, and therefore there was no prospect of success on judicial review.
12 Jun 2023
Appeal dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any viable ground to reverse the judge's refusal of leave; no demonstrable error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality was shown in the Board's decision, and factual assessments including internal relocation are for the Board, not the court.