18 Mar 2020
FRIENDSHIP INVESTMENTS LTD v. TO CHUN FAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 356
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCW197/2018
The court refused to draw the adverse inference that the petitioner deliberately misled Chung J because the allegation was serious and not supported by compelling evidence; it was not plain and obvious that the 7th respondent was unnecessary because discovery by the 7th respondent might be necessary and O15 r6(2)(b)(i) could apply. Accordingly the summons to strike out under Order 18 r19 was dismissed and the 7th respondent remains a party.