31 Mar 2014
香港特別行政區 訴 張峻堯
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 張峻堯
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA527/2013
The court held that the prosecution satisfied s.68(1)(c) by sending the proposed charge notice by registered post within the statutory period and the prosecution need not prove actual receipt absent satisfactory rebuttal; the defence evidence did not rebut service or show prejudice, and although the magistrate erred by insufficiently analysing dangerous driving, the evidence supported substituting a conviction for careless driving.