25 Oct 2006
UNITED GRAND LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
- Citation
- UNITED GRAND LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL38/2005
No clear and unambiguous representation existed to give rise to a substantive legitimate expectation of R(B) zoning or a guaranteed plot ratio of 2.1; refusal to grant a two-week extension did not cause substantive prejudice and was not procedurally unfair; the Board's decision fell within its planning discretion and was not Wednesbury unreasonable — application for judicial review dismissed.