19 Mar 2024
RE SACDALAN MARIO CAPISTRANO
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 253
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV419/2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b), failed to set out viable or specific grounds for the intended appeal (including particulars of alleged irrationality), and did not comply with directions to file written submissions; therefore the statutory requirements for granting leave were not met.