31 Dec 2021
The Court dismissed the application for leave because the applicants failed to demonstrate the appeal raised a question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b); the complaints about lack of legal and language assistance were considered but did not meet the statutory threshold and the applicants failed to engage with the Court's reasons.
30 Sept 2021
The applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) or any specific legal error in the court's judgment; therefore discretion to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is not engaged and leave is refused.
10 Feb 2021
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) Cap 484, his asserted COI ground had no merit given the Board's finding that the claim was fabricated (so COI would not affect the outcome), and his other grounds were not reasonably arguable or particularised.
22 Jan 2019
Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable ground of appeal or any question of great general or public importance, and therefore did not satisfy section 22(1)(b) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance.
23 Nov 2018
Refusal of leave: the applicant failed to demonstrate a question of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b) and sought to raise new points not advanced at the substantive appeal, so the statutory threshold for leave was not met.