5 May 2016
L v. B
- Citation
- L v. B
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT41/2015
The Court found the Respondent's challenge was not manifestly valid and the corrections were arithmetic and within the Tribunal's power; given the risk of delay, lack of full disclosure and apparent delaying tactics, the Court exercised its discretion under Order 73 r10A and the Convention to require security; accordingly the application to set aside was adjourned for 4 months on condition that the Respondent provides security of HK$41,600,000 within 21 days, failing which the set-aside application will be dismissed and the Applicant may enter judgment in terms of the Award; costs to be paid…