27 Feb 2009
HKSAR v. SO TAI FAI ANITA
- Citation
- HKSAR v. SO TAI FAI ANITA
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC23/2007
The Court upheld the convictions and sentences because the circumstantial and direct evidence taken as a whole established that the applicant conducted unauthorized trading, signed the Bought/Sold Orders and caused the forged Demand Notes to be submitted; no undue delay prejudice was shown and the concurrent five-year sentences were justified by the serious breach of trust and need for deterrence.