12 Mar 2020
MADISON LAB LTD v. PU YAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 382
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP757/2019
The court found a substantial bona fide triable dispute as to whether payments to Y's Service constituted valid discharge of the SPA consideration and whether Nakamura/Y's Service had ostensible authority; because the issues require trial evidence and findings, presentation of winding-up petitions based on the disputed debts would be an abuse of process and a final injunction restraining such petitions was granted; the strike-out application succeeded only as to paragraph 124 of Kelman's affirmation.